Add to
del.icio.us
Digg this
Get a great Ubuntu Linux dedicated server for less than $3 a day!
Share on Twitter
September 17, 2011
MasterCard said late yesterday that it will use Google's mobile payment solution for its own customers's needs. The
credit card company is the exclusive issuer for the launch of Google Wallet, a digital payment application for Google
Android smartphones.
Overall, Google Wallet allows users to store credit card information, gift cards, and loyalty cards in a digital
format on their own phones.
And using short range wireless technology known as near field communications, or NFC, it allows people to pay for
things with their phones.
The Samsung Nexus S on Sprint Nextel will be the first phone
to get the Google Wallet application. MasterCard has worked with other partners outside the U.S. and is already offering
mobile payments via cell phones in other parts of the world, including the U.K. and Turkey.
In 1998, Microsoft made an attempt in creating its own wallet application but the project never got off the ground.
Using MasterCard's PayPass tap-to-pay system consumers can simply swipe or tap their phones to pay for everything from
a Coke in a vending machine to a ride in a New York City taxi or to get a quick lunch at a McDonald's restaurant anywhere
in the United States.
At an event in New York City this week, the company showed off some of the capabilities of the Google Wallet, which
was announced in May and is expected to launch this fall. And it also showed off some new applications for mobile
payments that it hasn't commercialized yet.
It's pretty obvious now that MasterCard wants to compete headon with Visa International on mobile payment systems.
With the Google Wallet, MasterCard showed how users could easily open the wallet with a four-digit password, choose
which credit card to use, and then tap a vending machine to buy a Coke.
Unfortunately for the demonstrators, the cellular phone network used by the vending machine to authenticate the payment
had a weak signal. So the purchase didn't actually go through.
Another demonstration showed how Google Wallet can keep track of spending for consumers. And if a certain predefined
limit is hit, it lets the user know.
In addition to the Google Wallet integration, MasterCard showed off how it plans to use QR Codes to let people buy things
more easily. In one demonstration it showed how a QR Code could be shown as part of a home shopping channel to allow people
to buy items they see on TV directly from their phones.
And in another demonstration, a TV commercial broadcast a high-frequency audio code that could be identified by the
phone. In each instance, the featured item on the TV appeared on the phone's screen. The shopper was then given the
opportunity to pay for the item or save it in a shopping cart.
MasterCard also showed how QR Codes could be used on posters in retail locations or in other public places to let
consumers buy goods on the spot. The company used a poster advertising a concert to demonstrate this. A user could
scan the QR Code or tap the phone to an NFC receiver to get access to a page where tickets to the concert could be bought.
Consumers also had the choice of unlocking a video of the band.
And then MasterCard showed how a customer using a QR Code reader or the NFC capability on a smartphone at a fast-food restaurant could order directly from
the phone without standing in line. The code and the NFC receiver were embedded in the table, and the idea was that once
patrons ordered and paid for their food, the server could just bring the food directly to the table.
Some of these new payment apps and features are being tested now in commercial markets, but MasterCard wouldn't say
when these new services would be generally available.
The hope is that as more smartphones come on the market with NFC technology embedded and with the ability to read QR
Codes, mobile payments will become the new way of paying for small and everyday items.
In other mobile news
There was a very important House Armed Services Committee hearing held Thursday that was supposed to be about
the impact of LightSquared's network on national security regarding its numerous issues with its network causing
interference with many GPS navigational systems used throughout the United States.
The U.S. Defense Department and the Military both make extensive use of GPS nav systems that could suffer interference
from LightSquared's ill-designed transmitters.
But what makes this hearing so unusual is the nonappearance of FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. It now questions the
overall scrutiny of lobbying in the executive branch and also creates some doubts about FCC decision-making process.
After all, just as the FAA is supposed to regulate and protect air travel in the U.S., the Federal Communications Commission's
mandate is to protect our airwaves and make sure that our wireless spectrum does not interfere with such mission-critical
systems such as the GPS navigational systems used aboard commercial aircraft.
Republican Michael Turner, chairman of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, began the hearing yesterday by criticizing
Genachowski for failing to appear at such a critical meeting.
Last Friday, during a congressional hearing before the House Science Committee yesterday, LightSquared again found itself in some very hot water when it faced some very pointed questions
about its network's impact on GPS service.
At issue is the ongoing interference that its network is causing to GPS navigational systems aboard commercial
aircraft, and the light approach that LightSquared has around these critical problems that can endanger the lives
of passengers. On average, lawmakers voiced skepticism about LightSquared's ability to mitigate its network's effect
on GPS, especially federal uses such as hurricane tracking, navigation systems and disaster response.
"I have the unfortunate responsibility to inform the subcommittee that FCC Chairman Genachowski refused to appear
today," Turner said, calling the no-show "symptomatic of a disregard by the Chairman to the consequences of the FCC's
January 26 waiver to LightSquared."
"I consider the Chairman's failure to show up today to be an affront to the House Armed Services Committee," added
Turner.
The FCC chairman had been asked to testify but did not attend the hearing, instead submitting a six-page letter to
Turner and California Democrat Loretta Sanchez. Instead, Julius Knapp, chief of the FCC's Office of Engineering Technology,
appeared at the meeting.
FCC spokeswoman Tammy Sun later denied that Genachowski had refused to testify, saying "The Chairman never refused
to testify nor did his staff make any such suggestions."
Aside from pointed remarks about Genachowski's absenteeism, Turner and other lawmakers also questioned how the FCC
came about its decision to grant LightSquared a conditional waiver for an LTE network in spectrum so close to GPS bands.
The waiver blocks LightSquared from deploying its network until it resolves the GPS interference issue, but government
agencies want more reassurance that the service won't go live until this critical issue is solved for good. LightSquared
itself did admit recently that its network could knock out some GPS systems right out of the sky, something that shocked
not just the FCC but the FAA as well, at a time of heightened security for the 10th anniversary of 9/11.
"Many have observed that the FCC followed an irregular process on the LightSquared waiver," Turner said, citing
letters sent by the Defense Department and NTIA voicing strong concerns about LightSquared's impact on GPS before the
agency granted the waiver.
Turner suggested that LightSquared backer and hedge fund billionaire Phil Falcone used his influence to get the
waiver, quoting a letter from the National Legal and Policy Center that stated "over the course of the past year, a
series of odd decisions, questionable meetings and procedural anomalies at the Federal Communications Commission and
White House highlight Mr. Falcone's growing influence in the hallways of government."
And the dust up over LightSquared's political connections extended beyond yesterday's Congressional hearing.
Just two days ago, the Center for Public Integrity released a report alleging that LightSquared executives lobbied
the White House for one-on-ones, dropping hints about its donations to Democrat politicians and a fundraising dinner
for President Barack Obama. The watchdog group based its report on e-mails obtained through the Freedom of Information
Act.
LightSquared CEO Sanjiv Ahuja called the insinuations "ludicrous" in a written response to Turner's remarks.
"It's difficult to charge that LightSquared has undue political influence when it was denied the opportunity to
testify at today's hearing of the House Armed Service Committee's Strategic Forces Subcommittee – or even be allowed a
one-on-one meeting with the chairman of that committee prior to the hearing, as the GPS industry was given," he said.
The company has $10,600 set aside for campaign contributions in a political action committee, Ahuja said, adding that
he himself gave $30,400 to both political parties in the months before LightSquared's waiver was granted late last year.
Falcone has contributed to both parties in the last eight years, "with two-thirds of his contributions going to
Republicans because of the founder's free market philosophy."
Nevertheless, Genachowski's absense at such a critical meeting yesterday speaks volumes about him and the FCC itself.
Wireless Industry News has been following the LightSquared story very closely for the past 8 months. What we are observing
here is this: LightSquared inherent profits are more important than the public's safety aboard commercial aircraft.
In case you didn't know this, GPS was invented by the U.S. Military and funded by U.S. taxpayers. And it is still fully
managed and administered by the U.S. govenment. To think that there could be some lobbying going on at Congress, political
parties and at the White House is revolting to say the least, especially when national security is concerned.
Here are just a few of the LightSquared stories we have covered so far:
1) LightSquared admits its network places GPS nav systems at risk
2) LightSquared is grilled by Congress over GPS interference issues
3) LightSquared says it has a solution to its GPS interference issues?
4) LightSquared steps up its offensive against the GPS industry
5) Sprint and LightSquared make a deal, share network spectrum
6) LightSquared has found another solution to its ill-designed network?
7) LightSquared becomes a MVNE, doesn't care about the interference it causes to GPS
Those news stories will help you better comprehend the scope of the whole issue, and how critical it is to the public's
overall safety.
Add to
del.icio.us
Digg this
Get a great Ubuntu Linux dedicated server for less than $3 a day!
Share on Twitter
Source: The House Armed Services Committee.
Advertise with us
Copyright © Wireless Industry News. All rights reserved.